Results
Marketing Boards, Marketing Orders, Marketing Promotion, Marketing Quotas
Agnew, Apportionment of Milk Quota, 37 J. L. SOCIETY SCOTLAND 29-32 (1-1992).
Alagia, Federal Milk Marketing Orders: A Fair Return to the Dairy Farmer Is Not Undue Price Enhancement, 21 SOUTH DAKOTA L. REV. 591-618 (1976).
Alagia, Federal Milk Order Regulations: A Defense, 24 SOUTH DAKOTA L. REV. 592-606 (1979).
ARMBRUSTER et al., FEDERAL MARKETING PROGRAMS IN AGRICULTURE: ISSUES AND OPTIONS (Interstate Printers and Publishers, Inc.) 326 pp. + illus. (1983).
Bailey, Status of Regional Dairy Compacts, 17 AGRICULTURAL LAW UPDATE 4-6 (2-2000). View this publication.
Bandow, Federal Marketing Orders: Good Food Rots While People Starve: Fruit Is Imported While Domestic Crops Are Left to Rot, 1985 BUSINESS & SOCIETY REV. 40-47 (1985).
Baumer, Federal Regulation of Milk Production and Sale Is Growing at the Expense of State Authority, 12 J. AGRICULTURAL TAXATION & LAW 36-77 (1990).
Brooks & Campbell, Marketing Quotas Under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON L. REV. 255-275 (1958). View this publication.
Brooks & Greenwood, The Use of Marketing Quotas in the Stabilization of the Sugar Industry, 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON L. REV. 131-159 (1958). View this publication.
Brooks, Federal Regulation of the Marketing of Farm Products, 30 ROCKY MT. L. REV. 457-472 (1958).
Brooks, Marketing of Farm Products Under Some of the Federal Regulatory Statutes, 6 S.C.L. Q. 247-293 (1954).
Brooks, The Pricing of Milk Under Federal Marketing Orders, 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON L. REV. 181-213 (1958). View this publication.
Cardwell, General Principles of Community Law and Milk Quotas, 29 COMMON MARKET L. R. 723-747 (1992).
Cardwell, Milk and Livestock Quotas as Property, 4 EDINBURGH L. REV. 168-190 (2000).
Case Note, Adjusting the Minimum Price of Milk: the Secretary of Agriculture's Sweeping Powers After ... (Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. Espy, 39 F.3d 1339, 7th Cir. 1994), 18 HAMLINE L. REV. 477-501 (1995). View this publication.
Case Note, Agriculture-Section 8c(5)(G) of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act Prohibits Federal Milk Marketing Orders from Requiring Compensatory Payments That Constitute Trade Barriers [Lehigh Valey Co-op. Farmers, Inc. v. U.S., 82 S. Ct. 1168], 111 UNIV. PENNSYLVANIA L. REV. 497-515 (1963).
Case Note, Constitutional Law-Commercial Speech: The Constitution-It's What's for Dinner [United States v. United Foods, Inc., 121 S. Ct. 2334 (2001)], 2 WYOMING L. REV. 617-640 (2002).
Case Note, United We Stand, Divided We Fall-- Arguing the Constitutionality of Commodity Checkoff Programs (United Stores v. United Foods, 533 U.S. 405, 2001), 56 ARKANSAS L. REV. 147-184 (2003). View this publication.
Comment, Hood v. DuMond [H.P. Hood & Sons v. DuMond, 337 U.S. 525]: A Study of the Supreme Court and the Ideology of Capitalism, 134 UNIV. PENNSYLVANIA L. REV. 657-701 (1985).
Comment, California Raisins: Compliance with the Federal Marketing Order and Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, 15 SAN JOAQUIN AGRICULTURAL L. REV. 89-115 (2006).
Comment, Food Security Act of 1985: Dairy Industry Changes, 31 SOUTH DAKOTA L. REV. 512-522 (1986). View this publication.
Comment, Grading for Quality and Quantity: Commodity Regulation Under Section 1622 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, 7 UNIV. OF TOLEDO L. REV. 1107-1124 (1976).
Comment, Interstate Grain Marketing Compact-Should Washington Be a Partner?, 15 GONZAGA L. REV. 797-832 (1980). View this publication.
Comment, Is a Grape Just a Grape? California Table Grape Commission’s Mandatory Assessment Funded Generic Advertising Scheme vs. Grower’s First Amendment Rights, 21 SAN JOAQUIN AGRICULTURAL L. REV. 207-234 (2012).
Comment, Milk Orders: Selected Topics, 31 SOUTH DAKOTA L. REV. 406-415 (1986). View this publication.
Comment, Preservation of the Commercial Speech Doctrine: Applying the Central Hudson Test to Compelled Monetary Assessments for Generic Agricultural Advertising, 25 HAMLINE L. REV. 79-115 (2001). View this publication.
Comment, Restructuring Marketing Order Advisory Boards to Serve the Public Interest, 11 UNIV. CALIFORNIA DAVIS L. REV. 623-646 (1978). View this publication.
Comment, State Regulation of Milk Producer Pricing and Sales in California, 11 UNIV. CALIFORNIA DAVIS L. REV. 491-510 (1978). View this publication.
Comment, The Effect of Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc. on Nongeneric Commodities: A Narrow Focus on a Broad Rule, 9 SAN JOAQUIN AGRICULTURAL L. REV. 95-116 (1999).
Crespi & McEowen, The Constitutionality of Generic Advertising Checkoff Programs, CHOICES 61-65 2nd Q. (2006). View this publication.
Crespi & Sexton, Got Milk Lawyers? Marketing Orders and Brand Promotion...Got (Milk) Lawyers?, CHOICES 18-23 (1st Q.) (2001). View this publication.
Dindinger, Free Speech for Mushrooms but Not Peaches: Economic Regulations After United Foods, Inc. [United States v. United Foods, Inc., 121 S. Ct. 2334 (2001)], 31 COLORADO LAWYER 61-64 (4-2002).
Gage, Some Problems of Farmers in Fluid Milk Marketing, 7 KANSAS L. REV. 311-333 (1959).
Garoyan, Marketing Orders, 23 UNIV. CALIF. DAVIS L. REV. 697-712 (1990). View this publication.
Green, Agricultural Marketing Boards in Canada: An Economic and Legal Analysis, 33 UNIV. TORONTO L. J. 407-434 (1983).
Hamilton, Public Policy Administration and Market Congestion: Flue-Cured Tobacco, 15 J. L. & ECONOMICS 233-258 (1972).
Hazlett, Commodity Promotion Update: "Got Milk?"(r) Campaign Survives Constitutional Challenge, 20 AGRICULTURAL LAW UPDATE 4-6 (5-2003). View this publication.
Hazlett, Commodity Promotion Update: District Courts Resolve Challenges to Apple, Milk Advertising Check-Off Campaigns, 20 AGRICULTURAL LAW UPDATE 4-7 (4-2003). View this publication.
Hazlett, Michigan District Court Finds Pork Promotion Program Unconstitutional, 19 AGRICULTURAL LAW UPDATE 4-6 (11-2002). View this publication.
Hazlett, South Dakota Judge Finds Beef Promotion Program Unconstitutional, 19 AGRICULTURAL LAW UPDATE 4-6 (8-2002). View this publication.
Heavin, The Dilemma of Change: A Story of the Saskatchewan Wheat Pool, 59 SASKATCHEWAN L. REV. 189-216 (1995).
Heifner, Government's Role in Milk Pricing: Then and Now: Discussion, 66 AMERICAN J. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS 778-779 (1984). View this publication.
Helmberger, Government's Role in Milk Pricing: Then and Now: Discussion, 66 AMERICAN J. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS 780-781 (1984). View this publication.
Heukels, Improper Milk Levies by the European Commission, 30 COMMON MKT L. REV. 368-386 (1993).
Hutt, Restrictions on the Free Movement of Fluid Milk Under Federal Milk Marketing Orders, 37 UNIV. DETROIT L. J. 525-604 (1960).
Ippolito & Masson, Social Cost of Government Regulation of Milk, 21 J. L. & ECONOMICS 33-65 (1978).
Kelley, An Introduction to Federal Marketing Orders for Fruits, Vegetables, Nuts and Specialty Crops, 18 AGRICULTURAL LAW UPDATE 4-6 (2-2001). View this publication.
Knutson et al., Farm-Level Consequences of Canadian and US Dairy Policies, 79 AMERICAN J. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS 1563-1572 (1997). View this publication.
Knutson, Geyer & Helmuth, Trade Practice Regulation, FEDERAL MARKETING PROGRAMS IN AGRICULTURE: ISSUES AND OPTIONS 239-268 (1983).
Knutson, Government's Role in Milk Pricing: Then and Now: Discussion, 66 AMERICAN J. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS 776-777 (1984). View this publication.