Agricultural Law: A Selected
Bibliography, 2002
Published in 55 ARKANSAS LAW REVIEW 303 (2002). Reproduced with permission from the Arkansas Law Review.
Table of Contents
AIR QUALITY
ALTERNATIVE
AGRICULTURE
ANIMAL LAW
ANTITRUST
AQUACULTURE
BANKRUPTCY
BIOTECHNOLOGY
BUSINESS
ORGANIZATIONS
COMMODITY
FUTURES
COOPERATIVES
CREDIT AND
FINANCE
ENDANGERED SPECIES
AND WILDLIFE PROTECTION
ENERGY
ENVIRONMENTAL
ISSUES NOT COVERED ELSEWHERE
FARM PROGRAMS
FOOD
FOOD SAFETY
FORESTRY
GENERAL AND
MISCELLANEOUS
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
INTERNATIONAL
TRADE
INVASIVE
SPECIES
LABOR
LAND
USE
LIABILITY AND
INSURANCE
MARKETING AND
SALES
PESTICIDES
AND HERBICIDES
PRODUCTION
CONTRACTS
PROPERTY LAW
PUBLIC LANDS
RECREATIONAL
USE
TAXATION AND ESTATE
PLANNING
WATER QUALITY
WATER RIGHTS
WETLANDS
Articles
Backstrom, Madonna J., II, Note, Methyl Bromide: The Problem, the Phase Out, and the Alternatives, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 213 (2002).
Hayes, David J. & Nicholas Gertler, The Role of Carbon Sequestration in the U.S. Response to Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 11350 (2002).
Marks, Josh, Note, Regulating Agricultural Pollution in Georgia: Recent Trends and the Debate Over Integrator Liability, 18 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 1031 (2002).
Noel, Christy, Preemption Hogwash: North Carolina's Judicial Repeal of Local Authority to Regulate Hog Farms, 80 N.C. L. Rev. 2021 (2002).
Articles
Adelman, David E. & John H. Barton, Environmental Regulation for Agriculture: Towards a Framework to Promote Sustainable Intensive Agriculture, 21 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 3 (2002).
Adler, Robert W., Fresh Water - Toward a Sustainable Future, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10167 (2002).
Davidson, John H., Sustainable Development and Agriculture in the United States, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10543 (2002).
Lucas, Scott C., Halting the Downward Spiral of Monoculturization and Genetic Vulnerability: Toward a Sustainable and Biodiverse Food Supply, 17 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 161 (2002).
Murphy, Sophia, Structural Distortions in World Agriculture Markets: Do WTO Rules Support Sustainable Agriculture? 27 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 605 (2002).
Monographs
Legal Office, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Legislative Studies 73, Law and Sustainable Development Since Rio: Legal Trends in Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (2002).
National Association of Environmental Law Societies, Sustainable Agriculture: Food for the Future (2002).
Nebraska Continuing Legal Education, Inc., Nebraska State Bar Association, Organic Products, Livestock Confinement, and More (2002).
Articles
2001 Legislative Review, 8 Animal L. 259 (2002).
Archer, Ryan M., Searching for the Montana Open Range: A Judicial and Legislative Struggle to Balance Tradition and Modernization in an Evolving West, 63 Mont. L. Rev. 197 (2002).
Bartlett, Steven J., Roots of Human Resistance to Animal Rights: Psychological and Conceptual Blocks, 8 Animal L. 143 (2002).
Case, Clark, Note, No Rule of Thumb: The Conflict of Digital Palpation Under the Horse Protection Act, 90 KY. L.J. 661 (2002).
Chandola, Varn, Dissecting American Animal Protection Law: Healing the Wounds With Animal Rights and Eastern Enlightenment, 8 Wis. Envtl. L.J. 3 (2002).
Cooper, Kelly Dickson, Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak in Europe Raises Environmental Concerns and Causes Economic Loss, 12 COLO. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 59 (2001).
Freedman, Heather Berit, Trade Epidemic: The Impact of the Mad Cow Crisis on EU-U.S. Relations, 25 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 343 (2002).
Garner, Robert, Political Ideology and the Legal Status of Animals, 8 Animal L. 77 (2002).
Kelley, J.M., Legislative Note, Implications of a Montana Voter Initiative That Reduces Chronic Wasting Disease Risk, Bans Canned Shooting, and Protects a Public Trust, 6 Great Plains Nat. Resources J. 89 (2001).
Mosel, Amy, What About Wilber? Proposing a Federal Statute to Provide Minimum Humane Living Conditions for Farm Animals Raised for Food Production, 27 U. Dayton L. Rev. 133 (2001).
Panel, The Legal Status of Nonhuman Animals, 8 Animal L. 1 (2002)
Schwartz, Carolyn A., Impact of Livestock Animal Disease Outbreaks on International Trade: A Study Focusing on the Current Foot-and-Mouth Disease and Mad Cow Disease Crises, 8 Ilsa J. Int'l & Comp. L. 255 (2001).
Speziale, Loren, Walking Through the New Jersey Equine Activity Statute: A Look at Judicial Statutory Interpretation in Jurisdictions with Similar Limited Liability Laws, 12 Seton Hall J. Sport L. 65 (2002).
Monographs
Jasper, Margaret C., Animal Rights Law (2d ed. 2002).
Articles
Hayenga, Marvin, et al., Churning Out the Links: Vertical Integration in the Beef and Pork Industries, Choices, Winter 2001-2002, at 19.
Hayenga, Marvin L., Cutting Verticals Down to Size: Congress, the Farm Bill, and Packer Control, Choices, Summer 2002, at 36.
McEowen, Roger A., et al., The 2002 Senate Farm Bill: The Ban on Packer Ownership of Livestock, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 267 (2002).
Monographs
Structural Change as a Source of Trade Disputes Under NAFTA (R. M. A. Loyns et al. eds, 2002), available at http://www.farmfoundation.org/teal/teal.pdf
Articles
Hlawati, Ian H., Comments, Loko I'a: A Legal Guide to the Restoration of Native Hawaiian Fishponds Within the Western Paradigm, 24 U. Haw. L. Rev. 657 (2002).
Schatzberg, Melissa, Salmon Aquaculture in Federal Waters: Shaping Offshore Aquaculture Through the Coastal Zone Management Act, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 249 (2002).
Monographs
McCoy, Henry D., Legal Pocket Guide to American Shellfish Laws and Regulations (2001).
McCoy, Henry D., Legal Pocket Guide to Ownership of Aquatic Animals and Plants (Julia M. Oliver ed., 1st ed. 2001).
Articles
Analysis Of Differences Between Bankruptcy Reform Legislation in the 107th Congress: Comparing H.R. 333 and S. 420, Nat'l Bankr. Conf. Newsl., May 2001, at 1.
Woodsmith, Jodi Lea, Comment, When a Food Processor Files Bankruptcy: What Every California Grower Should Know Before Contracting to Sell Crops, 12 San Joaquin Agric. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Monographs
Pittman, Harrison M., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, Husband and Wife Farmers in Agricultural Bankruptcies: The "Tools of the Trade" Exemption (2002), at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Young Lawyers Division, State Bar of Wisconsin & Wisconsin Farmers Assistance Program, et al., A Legal Guide for Wisconsin Farmers (2001), available at http://www.legalexplorer.com/resources/database/PubPDFs/57-FARM.pdf.
Articles
Applegate, John S., The Prometheus Principle: Using the Precautionary Principle to Harmonize the Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 207 (2001).
Bandrinarayana, Deepa, To Trade or Not To Trade, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10512 (2002).
Barham, Bradford L. & Jeremy Foltz, rBST Adoption in the United States: That Was the Juggernaut … That Wasn't, Choices, Summer 2002, at 15.
Boens, Lonie, Glyphosate-Resistant Soybeans: An Introduction, 6 Great Plains Nat. Resources J. 36 (2001).
Brush, Stephen B., Genetically Modified Organisms in Peasant Farming: Social Impact and Equity, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 135 (2001).
Buechle, Kurt, The Great, Global Promise of Genetically Modified Organisms: Overcoming Fear, Misconceptions, and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 283 (2001).
Cummins, Enda, et al., BSE: Risk, Uncertainty, and Policy Change, 13 RISK 95 (2002).
Davies, Julie A. & Lawrence C. Levine, Biotechnology's Challenge to the Law of Torts, 32 McGeorge L. Rev. 221 (2000).
DeGregori, Thomas R., NGOs, Transgenic Food, Globalization, and Conservation, 13 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 115 (2002).
Devernoe, David L., Note, Substantial Equivalence: A Valid International Sanitary and Phytosanitary Risk Assessment Objective for Genetically Modified Foods, 51 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 257 (2000).
Eckley, Nathan W., Reaping the Benefits of Agricultural Biotechnology, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (2002).
Ewing, James F., Note, Agricultural Biotechnology: Is the International Regulation of Transgenic Agricultural Plants for the Birds (and the Bees)?, 25 Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 617 (2002).
Gruber, Teresa A., Web of Life, Envtl. F., May-June 2002, at 22.
Gupta, Aartl, Advance Informed Agreement: A Shared Basis for Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms?, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 265 (2001).
Guruswamy, Lakshman D., Sustainable Agriculture: Do GMOs Imperil Bio-safety? 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 461 (2002).
Hazlett, Anne, White House Announces Plan to Further Regulate Genetically-Modified Crops, Agric. L. Update, Sept. 2002, at 4.
Jones, Adam W., Note, What Liability of Growing Genetically Engineered Crops?, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 621 (2002).
Kellow, Aynsley, Risk Assessment and Decision-Making for Genetically Modified Foods, 13 Risk 115 (2002).
Kershen, Drew, Agricultural Biotechnology: Environmental Benefits for Identifiable Environmental Problems, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 11312 (2002).
Kirby, Sarah, Note, Genetically Modified Foods: More Reasons to Label Than Not, 6 Drake J. Agric. L. 351 (2001).
Kowalski, Stanley P. & R. David Kryder, Golden Rice: A Case Study in Intellectual Property Management and International Capacity Building, 13 RISK 47 (2002).
Lee, Maria & Robert Burrell, Liability for the Escape of GM Seeds: Pursuing the 'Victim'? 65 Mod. L. Rev. 517 (2002).
Lin, William et al., StarLink™: Where No CRY9C Corn Should Have Gone Before, Choices, Winter 2001-2002 at 31.
Mahoney, Ben, Biotechnology in Plant Agriculture: A Financier's Primer, 12 J. Banking & Fin. L. & Prac. 259 (2001).
McGarity, Thomas O., Seeds of Distrust: Federal Regulation of Genetically Modified Foods, 35 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 403 (2002).
Mehta, Michael D., Public Perceptions of Genetically Engineered Foods: 'Playing God' or Trusting Science?, 12 RISK 205 (2001).
Messer, Ellen, Food Systems and Dietary Perspective: Are Genetically Modified Organisms the Best Way to Ensure Nutritionally Adequate Food? 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 65 (2001).
Miskiel, Frank J., Comment, Voluntary Labeling of Bioengineering Food: Cognitive Dissonance in the Law, Science, and Public Policy, 38 Cal. W. L. Rev. 223 (2001).
Nachtigal, Nicole C., Case Note, A Modern David and Goliath Farmer v. Monsanto: Advising a Grower on the Monsanto Technology Agreement 2001, 6 Great Plains Nat. Resources J. 50 (2001).
Nelson, Amelia P., Note, Legal Liability in the Wake of Starlink: Who Pays in the End? 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 241 (2002).
Ohlgart, Samantha M., Note, The Terminator Gene: Intellectual Property Rights vs. the Farmers' Common Law Right to Save Seed, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 473 (2002).
Pimentel, David, Overview of the Use of Genetically Modified Organisms and Pesticides in Agriculture, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 51 (2001).
Redick, Thomas P. & John T. Walsh, Managing Agricultural Risks After Starlink: The Role of Injunctions and Contracts in Containing Biotech Crop Risks, Agric. L. Update, June 2002, at 4.
Safrin, Sabrina, Note, Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements, 96 Am. J. Int'l L. 606 (2002).
Sagoff, Mark, Biotechnology and Agriculture: The Common Wisdom and Its Critics, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 13 (2001).
Schnier, David J., Genetically Modified Organisms and the Cartagena Protocol, 12 Fordham Envtl. L.J. 377 (2001).
Smitherman, Charles W., III, Comment, World Trade Organization Adjudication of the European Union-United States Dispute over the Moratorium on the Introduction of New Genetically Modified Foods to the European Common Market: A Hypothetical Option of the Dispute Panel, 30 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 475 (2002).
Stewart, Patrick A. et al., Regulating the New Agricultural Biotechnology by Managing Innovation Diffusion, 32 Am. Rev. Pub. Admin. 78 (2002).
Uchtmann, D. L., Starlink: A Case Study of Agricultural Biotechnology Regulation, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 159 (2002).
Wallström, Margot, The European Commission's Position on GMOs: Will Consumers Be Convinced?, 25 Fletcher F. World Aff. 75 (2001).
Williams, Tracy, Cloning and the Conservation of Species, 12 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 215 (2001).
Yelpaala, Kojo, Owning the Secret of Life: Biotechnology and Property Rights Revisited, 32 McGeorge L. Rev. 111 (2000).
Monographs
Cadot, Olivier & David Vogel, Brookings Institution, France, The United States, and the Biotechnology Dispute (2001), available at http://www.brookings.org/fp/cusf/analysis/biotech.htm.
Committee on Environmental Impacts Associated with Commercialization of Transgenic Plants, National Research Council, Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants: The Scope and Adequacy of Regulation (2002), available at http://nap.edu/books/0309082633/html.
Earthscan & Sustainable Development Programme, The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? (Christoph Bail et al. eds., 2002).
Isaac, Grant, Agricultural Biotechnology and Transatlantic Trade: Regulatory Barriers to GM Crops (2002).
Kershen, Drew L., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, Legal Liability Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology (2002), at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
McLean, Morven A., et al., International Service for National Agricultural Research, ISNAR Briefing Paper 47, A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Biosafety: Linking Policy, Capacity, and Regulation (2002), available at http://www.isnar.cgiar.org/publications/briefing/abstract/PrintVersion.cfm?I=1585&P=3.
Mekouar, Ali, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Legal Papers Online #24, A Global Instrument on Biodiversity: The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (2002), at http://www.fao.org/Legal/prs-ol/lpo24.pdf.
Articles
Blank, Steven C., Is Agriculture a "Way of Life" or a Business?, Choices, Summer 2002, at 26.
Monographs
Goforth, Carol R., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, An Introduction to the Federal Securities Laws as They Might Apply to Agricultural Operations (2002), at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Goforth, Carol R., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, An Overview of Organizational and Ownership Options Available to Agricultural Enterprises, Parts I & II (2002), at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Articles
Vitale, Louis, Interest Rate Swaps Under the Commodity Exchange Act, 51 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 539 (2001).
Monographs
Clark, Ephraim, et al., International Commodity Trading: Physical and Derivative Markets (2001).
Edwards, Charles W., et al., Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000: Law and Explanation (2001).
Stephens, John J., Institute of Internal Auditors, Managing Commodity Risk: Using Commodity Futures and Options (2001).
Varangis, Panayotis N., et al., World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 2793, Agricultural Markets and Risks: Management of the Latter, Not the Former (2002), available at http://econ.worldbank.org/view.php?topic=8&type=5&id=12288.
Articles
Claiborne, David P., The Perils of the Capper-Volstead Act and its Judicial Treatment: Agricultural Cooperation and Integrated Farming Operations, 38 Willamette L. Rev. 263 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Handling Gains and Losses on Cooperative Stock, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 1 (2002).
Harl, Neil E. & Roger A. McEowen, On Failure of a Cooperative: When Is a Loss Deductible? 13 Agric. L. Dig. 185 (2002).
Mollet, Jeffrey A., Value Added Cooperatives: Issues for Organization, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 87 (2002).
Sudderth, Tara N. & Tonya Flesher, Patronage Dividends: Bumper Crop or Tax Blight for Small Farmers, Taxes, May 2002, at 35.
Monographs
Goforth, Carol R., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, An Introduction to the Federal Securities Laws as They Might Apply to Agricultural Operations (2002), at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Articles
Brown, John L., Federal Preemption of the State Regulation of Agricultural Credit, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 563 (2002).
Burkett, Paeton Leighann, Production Credit Associations: Their History and the Controversy Over Their Tax-Exempt Status, 29 S.U. L. Rev. 1 (2001).
Burnham, Scott J., Agricultural Liens Under Revised Article 9, 63 Mont. L. Rev. 91 (2002).
Flink, Carl, Finding a Place for Low-Income Family Farmers in the Legal Services Equation, 35 Clearinghouse Rev. 677 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Changing CCC Loan Reporting, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 33 (2002).
Krub, Karen, Changes to FSA's Emergency Loan Program Effective February 7, Farmers' Legal Action Rep., 2002/1, at 1.
Krub, Karen, Electronic Payment of Federal Loan Proceeds and Benefits, Farmers' Legal Action Rep., 2002/2, at 1.
Schneider, Susan A., Notes on Agricultural Landlord's Liens Under Revised Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 2002 Ark. L. Notes 53.
Schneider, Susan A., Shared Appreciation Agreements: Confusion and Mismanagement Threatens Family Farmers, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 107 (2002).
Monographs
Laurence, Robert, National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, The Enforcement of Money Judgments Across Indian Reservation Boundaries (2002), at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Schneider, Susan A., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, Statutory Agricultural Liens Under Revised Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (2002), at blankline http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Young Lawyers Division, State Bar of Wisconsin & Wisconsin Farmers Assistance Program et al., A Legal Guide for Wisconsin Farmers (2001), available at http://www.legalexplorer.com/resources/database/PubPDFs/57-FARM.pdf.
Articles
Armstrong, Amy, Critical Habitat Designations Under the Endangered Species Act: Giving Meaning to the Requirements for Habitat Protection, 10 S.C. Envtl. L.J. 53 (2002).
Benson, Melinda Harm, The Tulare Case: Water Rights, the Endangered Species Act, and the Fifth Amendment, 32 Envtl. L. 551 (2002).
Bramblett, Brian, Wolves in the West: The Triumph of Section 10(j) of the Endangered Species Act, 22 Pub. Land & Resources L. Rev. 132 (2001).
Cheever, Frederico, Property Rights and the Maintenance of Wildlife Habitat: The Case for Conservation Land Transactions, 38 Idaho L. Rev. 431 (2002).
Fleming, Jacalyn R., Comment, The Scope of Federal Authority Under the Endangered Species Act: Implications for Local Land Use Planning, 65 Alb. L. Rev. 497 (2001).
Popescu, Ada, Notes on the USDA Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP), Agric. L. Update, Mar. 2002, at 4.
Robinson, Eric N., Claims Court Rules That Giving Farmers' Water to Fish Requires Just Compensation, 19 Cal. Real Prop. J. 29 (2001).
Williams, Tracy, Cloning and the Conservation of Species, 12 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 215 (2001).
Monographs
Cirelli, M. T., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Legislative Studies 74, Legal Trends in Wildlife Management (2002).
Czech, Brian & Paul R. Krausman, Center for American Places, The Endangered Species Act: History, Conservation Biology, and Public Policy (2001).
Endangered Species : Issues and Analyses (Paul Foreman ed., 2002).
The Endangered Species Act: Law, Policy, and Perspectives (Donald C. Baur & William Robert Irvin eds., 2002).
Petersen, Shannon C., Acting for Endangered Species: The Statutory Ark (2002).
Articles
Hamilton, Joel R. & R. Garth Taylor, Brownouts in California, Brown Fields in Idaho, Choices, Winter 2001-2002, at 6.
Ottinger, Richard L. & Rebecca Williams, Renewable Energy Sources for Development, 32 Envtl. L. 331 (2002).
Articles
Adelman, David E. & John H. Barton, Environmental Regulation for Agriculture: Towards a Framework to Promote Sustainable Intensive Agriculture, 21 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 3 (2002).
Early, W. Blaine, III & Judith A. Villines, Environmental Regulation of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, Bench & Bar, Sept. 2002, at 11.
Heller, Matthew, Got Manure? Cal. Law., Feb. 2002, at 18.
Malone, Linda A., Recent Developments Concerning Environmental Law and Agriculture, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 341 (2002).
Reid, Michael S., Agriculture and the Environment: Building a Sustainable and Healthy Future, Environs Envtl. L. & Pol'y J., Spring 2002, at 55.
Ruhl, J.B., Three Questions for Agriculture about the Environment, 17 J. Land Use & Envtl. L. 395 (2002).
Salzman, James, Executive Order 13,141 and the Environmental Review of Trade Agreements, 95 Am. J. Int'l L. 366 (2001).
Tarlock, A. Dan, Ideas Without Institutions: The Paradox of Sustainable Development, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 35 (2001).
Zellmer, Sandra B. & Scott A. Johnson, Biodiversity in and Around McElligot's Pool, 38 Idaho L. Rev. 473 (2002).
Monographs
Kelley, Sally J., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, Federal and State Environmental Law: An Annotated Bibliography and Guide to Research in the Young Law Library (rev. ed. 2002), available at http://www.NationalAgLawCenter.org/bibguide/bibguides.htm.
Kelley, Sally J., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, International Environmental Law: A Selected Bibliography of Resources in the Young Law Library (rev. ed. 2002), available at http://www.NationalAgLawCenter.org/bibguide/bibguides.htm.
Nagle, John Copeland & J. B. Ruhl, The Law of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management (2002).
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Alaska Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Connecticut Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Kentucky Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Minnesota Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Mississippi Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Missouri Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Montana Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Nevada Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting New Hampshire Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting New York Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Pennsylvania Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Washington Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information & National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, State Environmental Laws Affecting Wisconsin Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.nasda-hq.org.
Articles
Fancher, Scott E., How Safe Is the Safety Net?: The Implications of Wiley v. Glickman, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 527 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Changing CCC Loan Reporting, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 33 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-171 (May 13, 2002) Part I, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 81 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-171 (May 13, 2002) Part II, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 93 (2002).
Hazlett, Anne, Resolving the Future of Farm Policy: Six-Year Farm Bill Signed, Agric. L. Update, May 2002, at 4.
Kelley, Christopher R., Introduction to Federal Farm Program Payment Legislation and Payment Eligibility Law, 2002 Ark. L. Notes 11.
Krub, Karen, So What Else Is in the 2002 Farm Bill?: Focus Report, Farmers' Legal Action Rep., May 2002, at 1.
Krueger, Jill, Changes to More Disaster Programs Likely On the Way, Farmers' Legal Action Rep., 2002/4, at 1.
Olson, Allen H., Federal Farm Programs, Past, Present and Future: Will We Learn from Our Mistakes?, 6 Great Plains Nat. Resources J. 1 (2001).
Zulauf, Carl R., Rethinking Price Supports and Insurance: How Risky Is Market Risk?, Choices, Summer 2002, at 16.
Monographs
Agriculture Issues and Policies (Alexander Berk ed., 2001).
Agricultural Policy for the Twenty-First Century (Luther G. Tweeten & Stanley R. Thompson eds., 1st ed. 2002).
Choate, Jean, Disputed Ground: Farm Groups That Opposed the New Deal Agricultural Program (2002).
Cochrane, Willard Wesley & Mary Ellen Ryan, American Farm Policy, 1948-1973 (UMI Books on Demand ed. 2002) (1976).
Gustafson, Leonard J. & John Wiebe, Canada Parliament, Looking South: U.S. Agriculture and Agri-Food Policy in the New Century: Interim Report (2001).
Hamilton, Neil D. & Iowa Food Policy Council, Putting a Face on Our Food: How State and Local Food Policies Can Promote the New Agriculture (2001), available at http://www.iowafoodpolicy.org/faceon.pdf.
Hurt, R. Douglas, Problems of Plenty: The American Farmer in the Twentieth Century (2002).
Kelley, Christopher R., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, Introduction to Federal Farm Payment Limitation and Payment Eligibility Law (2002), at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Moyer, H. Wayne. & Timothy Edward Josling, Agricultural Policy Reform: Politics and Process in the EU and US 1990s (2002).
Searchinger, Timothy D., Environmental Defense, Food for Thought: The Case for Reforming Farm Programs to Preserve the Environment and Help Family Farmers, Ranchers and Foresters (2001), available at http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/160_foodforthought.pdf.
Soil and Water Conservation Society, A Farm Bill Proposal: Responding to the Grassroots (2001), available at http://www.swcs.org/docs/SOIL%20%20WATER%20final.pdf.
Articles
Gardner, Paige, The Conference on Sustainable Food Security for All by 2020 Concedes That Goal Is Unlikely, 12 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 81 (2001).
Gilhooley, Margaret, Constitutionalizing Food and Drug Law: When Avoidance Is Right, 38 Hous. L. Rev. 1383 (2002) (response to Lars Noah, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 137 (2000)).
Hamilton, Neil D., Putting a Face on Our Food: How State and Local Food Policies Can Promote the New Agriculture, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 407 (2002).
Jacobson, Jared, Case Note, Are Kosher Food Consumers No Longer Entitled to Protection from Fraud and Misrepresentation in the Marketplace?, 75 St. John's L. Rev. 485 (2001).
Jones, Eluned, Entity Preservation and Passport Agriculture: EU vs. USA, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 381 (2002).
Lucas, Scott C., Halting the Downward Spiral of Monoculturization and Genetic Vulnerability: Toward a Sustainable and Biodiverse Food Supply, 17 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 161 (2002).
Messer, Ellen, Food Systems and Dietary Perspective: Are Genetically Modified Organisms the Best Way to Ensure Nutritionally Adequate Food?, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 65 (2001).
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., Looking for the Nutritional Label: Does it Make a Difference?, Choices, Winter 2001-2002, at 39.
Schaffer, Emily J., Is the Fox Guarding the Henhouse? Who Makes the Rules in American Nutrition Policy?, 57 Food & Drug L.J. 371 (2002).
Monographs
Food and Drug Law Institute, Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Statutory Supplement (2002).
Hamilton, Neil D. & Iowa Food Policy Council, Putting a Face on Our Food: How State and Local Food Policies Can Promote the New Agriculture (2001), available at http://www.iowafoodpolicy.org/faceon.pdf.
A Practical Guide to Food and Drug Law and Regulation (Kenneth R. Piña & Wayne L. Pines eds., 2d ed. 2002).
Vetter, James Louis, American Institute of Baking & Food and Drug Administration, Food Labeling: Requirements for FDA Regulated Products (2002).
Articles
Bandrinarayana, Deepa, To Trade or Not To Trade, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10512 (2002).
Bohanes, Jan, Risk Regulation in WTO Law: A Procedure-Based Approach to the Precautionary Principle, 40 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 323 (2002).
Buechle, Kurt, The Great, Global Promise of Genetically Modified Organisms: Overcoming Fear, Misconceptions, and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 283 (2001).
Colloton, Meghan, Dietary Supplements: A Challenge Facing the FDA in Mad Cow Disease Prevention, 51 Am. U. L. Rev. 495 (2002).
Devernoe, David L., Note, Substantial Equivalence: A Valid International Sanitary and Phytosanitary Risk Assessment Objective for Genetically Modified Foods, 51 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 257 (2000).
Ford, Rosemary A., The Beef Hormone Dispute and Carousel Sanctions: A Roundabout Way of Forcing Compliance with World Trade Organization Decisions, 27 Brook. J. Int'l L. 543 (2002).
Freedman, Heather Berit, Trade Epidemic: The Impact of the Mad Cow Crisis on EU-U.S. Relations, 25 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 343 (2002).
Jones, Eluned, Entity Preservation and Passport Agriculture: EU vs. USA, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 381 (2002).
McGarity, Thomas O., Seeds of Distrust: Federal Regulation of Genetically Modified Foods, 35 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 403 (2002).
Muth, Mary K., The Price of Food Safety: The Real Economic Effects of a Major Food Safety Regulation on Meat and Poultry, Choices, Summer 2002, at 31.
Pestronk, Robert M., et al., Protecting Our Vulnerable Food Supply, 30 J.L. Med. & Ethics 96 (2002).
Salmon, Naomi, A European Perspective on the Precautionary Principle, Food Safety and the Free Trade Imperative of the WTO, 27 Eur. L. Rev. 138 (2002).
Schnier, David J., Genetically Modified Organisms and the Cartagena Protocol, 12 Fordham Envtl. L.J. 377 (2001).
Schwartz, Carolyn A., Impact of Livestock Animal Disease Outbreaks on International Trade: A Study Focusing on the Current Foot-and-Mouth Disease and Mad Cow Disease Crises, 8 ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 255 (2001).
Smith, James F., From Frankenfood to Fruit Flies: Navigating the WTO/SPS, 6 U.C. Davis J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 1 (2000).
Wright, Ronald F. & Paul Huck, Counting Cases About Milk, Our 'Most Nearly Perfect' Food, 1860-1940, 36 Law & Soc'y Rev. 51 (2002).
Monographs
1B Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, Codex Alimentarius, General Requirements: Food Hygiene (2d rev. ed. 2001).
8 Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, Codex Alimentarius, Fats, Oils and Related Products (2d rev. ed. 2001), available at http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/Y2774E/Y2774E00.HTM.
9A Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, Codex Alimentarius, Fish and Fishery Products (2d ed. 2001).
Food and Drug Law Institute, Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Statutory Supplement (2002).
Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, Report of the Twenty-Fourth Session of the Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission (2002), available at http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/MEETING/005/Y1560E/Y1560E00.HTM.
A Practical Guide to Food and Drug Law and Regulation (Kenneth R. Piña & Wayne L. Pines eds., 2d ed. 2002).
Articles
Colligan, David J., Forest Land Taxation in the New Millennium: Stewardship Incentivized, 78 Denv. U. L. Rev. 413 (2001).
Fischman, Robert L., Stumbling to Johannesburg: The United States' Haphazard Progress Toward Sustainable Forestry Law, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10291 (2002).
Steiner, Melanie, The Journey from Rio to Johannesburg: Ten Years of Forest Negotiations, Ten Years of Successes and Failures, 32 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 629 (2002).
Sugden, Brian, The Timber Industry Perspective: TMDLs and Forestry, Trying to Make a Square Peg Round, 22 Pub. Land & Resources L. Rev. 47 (2001).
Monographs
Gullison, Ted, et al., Logging Off: Mechanisms to Stop or Prevent Industrial Logging in Forests of High Conservation Value (2001), available at http://www.ucsusa.org/publication.cfm?publicationID=69.
Lind, Brenda, Land Trust Alliance, Working Forest Conservation Easements: A Process Guide for Land Trusts, Landowners and Public Agencies (2001).
Lindsay, Jon, et al., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Legal Papers Online #27, Why Law Matters: Design Principles for Strengthening the Role of Forestry Legislation in Reducing Illegal Activities and Corrupt Practices (2002), at http://www.fao.org/Legal/prs-ol/lpo27.pdf.
Logan, Robert S., Oregon Forest Resources Institute, Oregon's Forest Protection Laws: An Illustrated Manual (2002).
Articles
Bahls, Steven C., September 11, 2001, and Agricultural Law, 7 Drake J. Ag-ric. L. 1 (2002).
Blank, Steven C., Is Agriculture a "Way of Life" or a Business?, Choices, Summer 2002, at 26.
Copeland, John D., The Tyson Story: An Update, 6 Drake J. Agric. L. 257 (2001).
Castro, Robert F., Exorcising Tombstone's Evil Spirits: Eradicating Vigilante Ranch Enterprises Through Public Interest Litigation, 20 Law & Ineq. J. 203 (2002).
Dunn, Amy J., Survey of Legislation, Agricultural Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 403 (2002).
Flink, Carl, Finding a Place for Low-Income Family Farmers in the Legal Services Equation, 35 Clearinghouse Rev. 677 (2002).
Kelley, Sally J., Agricultural Law: A Selected Bibliography, 2001, 55 Ark. L. Rev. 303 (2002), available at http://www.NationalAgLawCenter.org/aglawbib/agbib01.htm.
Levins, Richard A., Collective Bargaining by Farmers Time for a Fresh Look?, Choices, Winter 2001-2002, at 15.
Tebo, Margaret Graham, New Approaches to Pro Bono; Lawyers Can Help Kids in the Courtroom - Or Down on the Farm, A.B.A. J., Dec. 2001, at 74.
Monographs
Agricultural Law Committee, State Bar of Texas & Texas Tech University School of Law, Agricultural Law Seminar (2002).
Colorado Bar Association et al., 11th Annual Western Agricultural & Rural Law Roundup (2002).
Gardner, Bruce L., American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century: How It Flourished and What It Cost (2002).
Kansas Bar Association, Representing the Ag Client (2 vols., 2002).
Kelley, Christopher R., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, Dealing with the USDA: Federal Administrative Law Basics (2002), at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Kelley, Sally J., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, Agricultural Law Research Guide (rev. ed. 2002), available at http://www.NationalAgLawCenter.org/bibguide/bibguides.htm.
Legal Office, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Legislative Studies 76, Gender and Law. Women's Rights in Agriculture (2002).
McEowen, Roger A. & Neil E. Harl, Law of the Land: Fundamentals of Agricultural Law (2002).
Minnesota Continuing Legal Education, The 11th Annual Agricultural and Rural Law Institute (2002).
Nebraska Continuing Legal Education, Inc., Nebraska State Bar Association, Organic Products, Livestock Confinement, and More (2002).
Articles
Antonelli, Matthew & Bernadette McCann Ezring, Actual Sales Data not Necessary to Show Market Acceptance of Grain Processing Substitute, 14 Intell. Prop. & Tech. L.J. 19 (2002).
Blakeney, Michael, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights, 24 E.I.P.R 9 (2002).
Carrillo-Heian, M.R, Comment, Eat Your Vegetables and Be Sued for Patent Infringement, 32 McGeorge L. Rev. 957 (2001).
Chambers, Jasemine, Patent Eligibility of Biotechnological Inventions in the United States, Europe, and Japan, 34 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 223 (2002).
Cripps, Yvonne, Patenting Resources: Biotechnology and the Concept of Sustainable Development, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 119 (2001).
Demaine, Linda J. & Aaron Xavier Fellmeth, Reinventing the Double Helix: A Novel and Nonobvious Reconceptualization of the Biotechnology Patent, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 303 (2002).
Ding, Chengfei, The Protection for New Plant Varieties of American Businesses in China after China Enters the WTO, 6 Drake J. Agric. L. 333 (2001).
Fishman, Renee M., et al., Codex Protects Parmesan Cheese Mark, 14 Intell. Prop. & Tech. L.J. 29 (2002).
Hazlett, Anne, Supreme Court Holds Utility Patents May Be Issued for Plants, Agric. L. Update, Jan. 2002, at 4.
Janis, Mark D., Sustainable Agriculture, Patent Rights, and Plant Innovation, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 91 (2001).
Kowalski, Stanley P. & R. David Kryder, Golden Rice: A Case Study in Intellectual Property Management and International Capacity Building, 13 RISK 47 (2002).
McEowen Roger A. & Neil E. Harl, Key Supreme Court Ruling on Plant Patents, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 9 (2002).
Meltzer, Eleanor K., Pass The Parmesan? What You Need to Know About Geographical Indications and Trademarks, Va. Law, June-July 2002, at 18.
Mendelson, Joseph, III, Patently Erroneous: How the U.S. Supreme Court's Decisions in Farm Advantage Ignores Congress and Threatens the Future of the American Farmer, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10698 (2002).
Mgbeoji, Ikechi, Patents and Traditional Knowledge of the Uses of Plants: Is a Communal Patent Regime Part of the Solution to the Scourge of Bio Piracy?, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 163 (2001).
Miller, Gina T., Comment, Are Current Patent Laws Discouraging Critical Research and Development on Chemical Alternatives to Methyl Bromide?, 12 San Joaquin Agric. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Ohlgart, Samantha M., Note, The Terminator Gene: Intellectual Property Rights vs. the Farmers' Common Law Right to Save Seed, 7 Drake J. Ag-ric. L. 473 (2002).
Pan, Susan Perng, Patent Damage Assessments After Rite-Hite and Grain Processing, 42 IDEA 481 (2002).
Parrett, James W., Jr, Note, A Proactive Solution to the Inherent Dangers of Biotechnology: Using the Invention Secrecy Act to Restrict Disclosure of Threatening Biotechnology Patents, 26 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 145 (2001).
Quick, John, Intellectual Property: Plants Patentable Under the Utility Patent Statute, PVA, and PVPA, 30 J.L. Med. & Ethics 317 (2002).
Sell, Susan K., Post-Trips Developments: The Tension Between Commercial and Social Agendas in the Context of Intellectual Property, 14 Fla. J. Int'l L. 193 (2002).
Shillito, Mark, et al., Patenting Genetically Engineered Plants, 24 E.I.P.R. 333 (2002).
Townsend, Kim, Registration of Cattle Brands, 12 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 91 (2001).
Uchtmann, Donald L., Can Farmers Save Roundup Ready® Beans for Seeds? McFarling and Trantham Cases Say "No," Agric. L. Update, Oct. 2002, at 4.
van der Kooij, Paul, Defending PBR: P, B, or R?, 24 E.I.P.R. 1 (2002).
Woessner, Warren D., The Evolution of Patents on Life: Transgenic Animals, Clones and Stem Cells, 83 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 830 (2001).
Monographs
9 Intellectual Property Law Unit, Queen Mary and Westfield College, Perspectives on Intellectual Property Series, IP in Biodiversity and Agriculture: Regulating the Biosphere (Peter Drahos & Michael Blakeney eds., 2001).
Blakeney, Michael, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Study Paper 3b, Access to Genetic Resources, Gene-Based Inventions and Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/text/study_papers/sp3b_blakeney_study.txt.
Helfer, Laurence L., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Intellectual Property Rights in Plant Varieties: An Overview with Options for National Governments (2002), at http://www.fao.org/Legal/prs-ol/lpo31-2.pdf.
Rangnekar, Dwijen, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Study Paper 3a, Access to Genetic Resources, Gene-Based Inventions and Agriculture (2002), available at http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/text/study_papers/sp3a_rangnekar_study.txt.
Who Owns Life? (David Magnus et al. eds., 2002).
Articles
Abbott, Phil, et al., Coming to Grips with Globalization, Choices, Winter 2001-2002, at 43.
Anderson, M. Jean, The Softwood Lumber Dispute, 27 Can.-U.S. L.J. 295 (2001).
Bandrinarayana, Deepa, To Trade or Not To Trade, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10512 (2002).
Bhala, Raj, The Bananas War, 31 McGeorge L. Rev. 839 (2000).
Bhala, Raj & David A. Gantz, WTO Case Review 2001, 19 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 457 (2002).
Bohanes, Jan, Risk Regulation in WTO Law: A Procedure-Based Approach to the Precautionary Principle, 40 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 323 (2002).
Brosch, Kevin J., Relative Roles of States/Provinces in Regulating Agriculture and the Resulting Impact On Cross-Border Trade, 27 Can.-U.S. L.J. 113 (2001).
Carmichael, Candace, Note, Foreign Sales Corporations: Subsidies, Sanctions, and Trade Wars, 35 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 151 (2002).
Coleman, Linda O'Neil, Comment, The European Union: An Appropriate Model for a Precautionary Approach? 25 Seattle U. L. Rev. 609 (2002).
Ding, Chengfei, Note, The Protection for New Plant Varieties of American Businesses in China After China Enters the WTO, 6 Drake J. Agric. L. 333 (2001).
Freedman, Heather Berit, Trade Epidemic: The Impact of the Mad Cow Crisis on EU-U.S. Relations, 25 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 343 (2002).
Gifford, Michael, Relative Roles of States/Provinces in Regulating Agriculture and the Resulting Impact on Cross-Border Trade: A Canadian Perspective, 27 Can.-U.S. L.J. 123 (2001).
Goh, Alexis, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The Lamb Meat Case, 2001 Australian Int'l L.J. 208 (2001).
Gonzalez, Carmen G., Institutionalizing Inequality: The WTO Agreement on Agriculture, Food Security, and Developing Countries, 27 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 433 (2002).
Gupta, Aartl, Advance Informed Agreement: A Shared Basis for Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms?, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 265 (2001).
Kerr, Andy & Mark Salvo, Bureau of Land Management National Conservation Areas: Legitimate Conservation or Satan's Spawn?, 20 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol'y 67 (2002).
Koremenos, Barbara, Can Cooperation Survive Changes in Bargaining Power? The Case of Coffee, 31 J. Legal Stud. 259 (2002).
Mach, Helmut, The Softwood Lumber Dispute, 27 Can.-U.S. L.J. 287 (2001).
Mills, Monte, Tough Duty: U.S.-Canada Softwood Lumber Relations in 2001, 2001 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 101 (2001).
Murphy, Sophia, Structural Distortions in World Agriculture Markets: Do WTO Rules Support Sustainable Agriculture? 27 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 605 (2002).
Palmer, Erin N., Comment, The World Trade Organization Slips Up: A Critique of the World Trade Organization's Dispute Settlement Understanding Through the European Union Banana Dispute, 69 Tenn. L. Rev. 443 (2002).
Prather, Mike J., International Trade and the Bioinvasion: A Price for Everything and Everything for a Price, Currents: Int'l Trade L.J., Winter 2001, at 45.
Roberts, Michael T., The Unique Role of State Trading Enterprises in World Agricultural Trade: Sifting Through Rhetoric, 6 Drake J. Agric. L. 287 (2001).
Salmon, Naomi, A European Perspective on the Precautionary Principle, Food Safety and the Free Trade Imperative of the WTO, 27 Eur. L. Rev. 138 (2002).
Salzman, James, Executive Order 13,141 and the Environmental Review of Trade Agreements, 95 Am. J. Int'l L. 366 (2001).
Saphen, Sabrina, The Bio-Safety Protocal [sic]: A Landmark International-Environmental Trade Agreement, 10 MSU-DCL J. Int'l L. 63 (2001).
Schnier, David J., Genetically Modified Organisms and the Cartagena Protocol, 12 Fordham Envtl. L.J. 377 (2001).
Schwartz, Carolyn A., Impact of Livestock Animal Disease Outbreaks on International Trade: A Study Focusing on the Current Foot-and-Mouth Disease and Mad Cow Disease Crises, 8 ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 255 (2001).
Smith, James F., From Frankenfood to Fruit Flies: Navigating the WTO/SPS, 6 U.C. Davis J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 1 (2000).
Smith, Tammy, Food Fight: An Appraisal of the Fruit and Vegetable Dispute Resolution Corporation, 11 Minn. J. Global Trade 285 (2002).
Stevenson, Peter, The World Trade Organisation Rules: A Legal Analysis of the Adverse Impact on Animal Welfare, 8 Animal L. 107 (2002).
Stewart, Terence P. & David S. Johanson, The WTO Beef Hormone Dispute: An Analysis of the Appellate Body Decision, 5 U.C. Davis J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 219 (1999).
Weisberger, Marc, The Application of Portugal v. Council: The Banana Cases, 12 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 153 (2002).
Wight, Jonathan B., Does Free Trade Cause Hunger? Hidden Implications of the FTAA, 2 Rich. J. Global L. & Bus. 167 (2001).
Williams, Alexander III, Note, More Assistance Please: Lifting the Cuban Embargo May Help Revive American Farms, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 455 (2002).
Monographs
Agricultural Trade Policies in the New Millennium (P. Lynn Kennedy & Won W. Koo eds., 2002).
Geboye Desta, Melaku, The Law of International Trade in Agricultural Products: From GATT 1947 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture (2002).
Globalization and Agricultural Trade Policy (Hans J. Michelmann ed., 2001).
Kelley, Sally J., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, International Trade Law: A Bibliography and Guide to Research in the Young Law Library (rev. ed. 2002), available at http://www.NationalAgLawCenter.org/bibguide/bibguides.htm.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Agriculture and Trade Liberalisation: Extending the Uruguay Round Agreement (2002).
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Global Marketplace : Agricultural Products, Legal Aspects (2001), available at http://www.agriculture.state.pa.us/agriculture/lib/agriculture/pdfdocs/legal_handbook.pdf
Public Concerns, Environmental Standards, and Agricultural Trade (Floor Brouwer & David E. Ervin eds., 2002).
Roberts, Ivan & Frank Jotzo, 2002 US Farm Bill: Support and Agricultural Trade (ABARE Research Report 01.13, 2001), available at http://www.abareonlineshop.com/product.asp?prodid=12270.
Structural Change as a Source of Trade Disputes Under NAFTA (R. M. A. Loyns et al. eds, 2002), available at http://www.farmfoundation.org/teal/teal.pdf
Trade and Agriculture: Negotiating a New Agreement? (Joseph A. McMahon ed., 2001).
Articles
McGee, Sarah, Proposals for Ballast Water Regulation: Biosecurity in an Insecure World, 12 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 141 (2001).
Prather, Mike J., International Trade and the Bioinvasion: A Price for Everything and Everything for a Price, Currents: Int'l Trade L.J., Winter 2001, at 45.
Monographs
Committee on the Scientific Basis for Predicting the Invasive Potential of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests in the United States, National Research Council, Predicting Invasions of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests (2002), available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10259.html.
Filbey, Meg, et al., Environmental Law Institute, Halting the Invasion: State Tools for Invasive Species Management (2002), available at http://www.elistore.org/reports_detail.asp?ID=10678 and http://www2.eli.org/research/invasives/invasives_form.cfm.
Nederlands Comité, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Invasive Plants and Animals: Is There a Way Out?: Proceedings of a Conference on Alien Invasive Species on the 26th of September, 2000 in the National Museum of Natural History Naturalis in Leiden, The Netherlands (W. Bergmans & Esther Blom eds., 2001).
Articles
Andrade, Sean A., Biting the Hand That Feeds You: How Federal Law Has Permitted Employers to Violate the Basic Rights for Farmworkers and How This Has Begun to Impact Other Industries, 4 U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 601 (2002).
Alvarado, Lorenzo A., Comment, A Lesson from My Grandfather, The Bracero, 22 Chicano-Latino L. Rev. 55 (2001).
Hall, Mary Lee, Defending the Rights of H-2A Farmworkers, 27 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 521 (2002).
Holley, Michael, Disadvantaged by Design: How the Law Inhibits Agricultural Guest Workers from Enforcing Their Rights , 18 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 575 (2001).
Kodman, Rod & Janna Trevisanut, Migrant Children Under Child Welfare Service Jurisdiction: Who Will Guard the Guards Themselves?, 12 San Joaquin Agric. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Lazos Vargas, Syvia R., "Latina/O-Ization" of the Midwest: Cambio De Colores (Change Of Colors) as Agromaquilas Expand into the Heartland, 13 Berkeley La Raza L.J. 343 (2002).
Manion, Jennifer T., Note, Cultivating Farmworker Injustice: The Resurgence of Sharecropping, 62 Ohio St. L.J. 1665 (2001).
Mitchell, Don M., The Geography of Injustice: Borders and the Continuing Immiseration of California Agricultural Labor in an Era of Free Trade, 2 Rich. J. Global L. & Bus. 145 (2001).
Tool, Shannon Adair, Comment, Farmworkers and FIFRA: Laboring Under the Cloud, 31 Sw. U. L. Rev. 93 (2001).
Vaca, Nicholas C., The Consent Form, Cal. Law., Aug. 2002, at 28.
Monographs
Thompson, Charles Dillard & Melinda F. Wiggins, The Human Cost of Food: Farmworkers' Lives, Labor, and Advocacy (2002).
Wester, Mark, et al., University of Florida, Staff Paper Series SP 02-1, Implications of Reform in Federal Guest Worker Legislation for Farm-Level Returns (2002).
Articles
Bean, Michael J., Overcoming Unintended Consequences of Endangered Species Regulation, 38 Idaho L. Rev. 409 (2002).
Becker, John C., Promoting Agricultural Development Through Land Use Planning Limits, 36 Real Prop. Prob. & Tr. J. 619 (2002).
Cordes, Mark W., Agricultural Zoning: Impacts and Future Directions, 22 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 419 (2002).
Coulthard, Robert A., The Changing Landscape of America's Farmland: A Comparative Look at Policies Which Help Determine the Portrait of Our Land: Are There Lessons We Can Learn from the EU? 6 Drake J. Agric. L. 261 (2001).
Feitshans, Theodore A., PDRs and TDRs: Land Preservation Tools in a Universe of Voluntary and Compulsory Land Use Planning Tools, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 305 (2002).
Hanson, Andrew C., Brewing Land Use Conflicts: Wisconsin's Right To Farm Law, 75 Wis. Law. 8 (2002).
Johnson, Edward J., Comment, The Effect of Historic Parcels on Agriculture-Harvesting Houses, 12 San Joaquin Agric. L. Rev. 49 (2002).
Salkin, Patricia E., The Smart Growth Agenda: A Snapshot of State Activity at the Turn of the Century, 21 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 271 (2002).
Salkin, Patricia E., Using Smart Growth To Achieve Sustainable Land Use Policies, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 11385 (2002).
Thomas, Lisa N., Comment, Forgiving Nuisance and Trespass: Is Oregon's Right-To-Farm Law Constitutional? 16 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 445 (2001).
Thompson, Barton H., Jr., Providing Biodiversity Through Policy Diversity, 38 Idaho L. Rev. 355 (2002).
Walker, Wendy K., Rights with Responsibilities Land Use Law Symposium: Whole Hog: The Pre-Emption of Local Control by the 1999 Amendment to the Michigan Right To Farm Act, 36 Val. U. L. Rev. 461 (2002).
Yaro, Robert, Portland, Oregon: A Lesson to Be Learned in Connecticut, 34 Conn. L. Rev. 617 (2002).
Monographs
Systems of Land Tenure in Various Countries: A Series of Essays Published Under the Sanction of the Cobden Club (J. W. Probyn ed., 2002) (1876).
Articles
Archer, Ryan M., Searching for the Montana Open Range: A Judicial and Legislative Struggle to Balance Tradition and Modernization in an Evolving West, 63 Mont. L. Rev. 197 (2002).
Fancher, Scott, FCIC's Standard Reinsurance Agreement, Agric. L. Update, Feb. 2002, at 4.
Harl, Neil E., Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRA), 13 Agric. L. Dig. 129 (2002).
Heller, Matthew, Got Manure? Cal. Law., Feb. 2002, at 18.
Jones, Adam W., Note, What Liability of Growing Genetically Engineered Crops?, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 621 (2002).
Krub, Karen, New NAP Rule: Important Disaster Program Changed for Better and for Worse, Farmers' Legal Action Rep., 2002/3, at 1
Krueger, Jill, Changes to More Disaster Programs Likely On the Way, Farmers' Legal Action Rep., 2002/4, at 1.
Morenoff, David L., Lost Food and Liability: The Good Samaritan Food Donation Law Story, 57 Food & Drug L.J. 107 (2002).
Speziale, Loren, Walking Through the New Jersey Equine Activity Statute: A Look at Judicial Statutory Interpretation in Jurisdictions with Similar Limited Liability Laws, 12 Seton Hall J. Sport L. 65 (2002).
Zulauf, Carl R., Rethinking Price Supports and Insurance: How Risky Is Market Risk?, Choices, Summer 2002, at 16.
Monographs
Fancher, Scott, National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, Scope of the Federal Crop Insurance Arbitration (2002), available at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Fancher, Scott, National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, FCIC's Standard Reinsurance Agreement (2002), available at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Articles
Harl, Neil E., Price Fixing in Agriculture, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 121 (2002).
Hazlett, Anne, South Dakota Judge Finds Beef Promotion Program Unconstitutional, Agric. L. Update, Aug. 2002, at 4.
Huether, Kristine M.H., Comment, Preservation of the Commercial Speech Doctrine: Applying the Central Hudson Test to Compelled Monetary Assessments for Generic Agricultural Advertising, 25 Hamline L. Rev. 79 (2001).
Jackson, Laura, Case Note, Constitutional Law: Commercial Speech, the Constitution, It's What's for Dinner, 2 Wyo. L. Rev. 617 (2002).
Martin, Susan Lorde, Changing the Law: Update from the Wine War, 17 J.L. & Pol. 63 (2001).
McEowen, Roger A. & Neil E. Harl, Proposed Packer Ban on Livestock Ownership or Control, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 65 (2002).
Redick, Thomas P. & John T. Walsh, Managing Agricultural Risks After Starlink: The Role of Injunctions and Contracts in Containing Biotech Crop Risks, Agric. L. Update, June 2002, at 4.
Schoen, Edward J., et al., Glick v. Wileman Bros. & Elliott: California Fruit Marketing Orders Prune the First Amendment, 10 Widener J. Pub. L. 21 (2000).
Schoen, Edward J., et al., United Foods and Wileman Bros.: Protection Against Compelled Commercial Speech-Now You See It, Now You Don't, 39 Am. Bus. L.J. 467 (2002).
Schoenhard, Paul M., The End of Compelled Contributions for Subsidized Advertising?, 25 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1185 (2002).
Woodsmith, Jodi Lea, Comment, When a Food Processor Files Bankruptcy: What Every California Grower Should Know Before Contracting to Sell Crops, 12 San Joaquin Agric. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Monographs
Hamilton, Neil D., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, Farmers' Markets Rules, Regulations and Opportunities (2002), available at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Small Farm and Direct Marketing Program , State of Washington, The Handbook of Regulations for Direct Farm Marketing : "The Green Book" (4th ed. 2001).
Articles
Backstrom, Madonna J., II, Note, Methyl Bromide: The Problem, the Phase Out, and the Alternatives, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 213 (2002).
Goldman, Lynn R., Preventing Pollution? U.S. Toxic Chemicals and Pesticides Policies and Sustainable Development, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 11018 (2002).
Miller, Gina T., Comment, Are Current Patent Laws Discouraging Critical Research and Development on Chemical Alternatives to Methyl Bromide?, 12 San Joaquin Agric. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Pimentel, David, Overview of the Use of Genetically Modified Organisms and Pesticides in Agriculture, 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 51 (2001).
Tool, Shannon Adair, Comment, Farmworkers and FIFRA: Laboring Under the Cloud, 31 Sw. U. L. Rev. 93 (2001).
Monographs
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides (2002), available at http://www.fao.org/waicent/FaoInfo/Agricult/AGP/AGPP/Pesticid/Code/PM%5FCode.htm
Meiners, Roger E., et al., PERC, Pesticides and Property Rights (2001), available at http://www.perc.org/pdf/ps22.pdf.
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, The Pesticide Report: Inaction Speaks Louder than Words: The Minnesota Department of Agriculture's Failure to Protect Minnesota from Pesticide Contamination (2001), available at http://www.mncenter.org/mcea/files/documents/Reports/full_pesticide_report.pdf.
Wolff, Gary, Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Health, Fair, and Profitable: A Win-Win Pesticide Policy: How Higher Pesticide Fees Can Improve Our Health, Environment, and Economy (2001), available at http://www.pacinst.org/reports/HealthyFairAndProfitable.pdf.
Articles
Hamilton, Neil D., Broiler Contracting in the United States: A Current Contract Analysis Addressing Legal Issues and Grower Concerns, 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 43 (2002).
Monographs
Hull, Jonathan Watts, Council of State Governments, Contracting in Tobacco (2001), available at http://www.slcatlanta.org/TobaccoContracting.pdf.
Articles
Abdalla, Charles W., et al., Community Conflicts Over Intensive Livestock Operations: How and Why Do Such Conflicts Escalate? 7 Drake J. Agric. L. 7 (2002).
Burling, James S., Private Property Rights and the Environment After Palazzolo, 30 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Cheever, Patricia, Property Rights and the Maintenance of Wildlife Habitat: The Case for Conservation Land Transactions, 48 Idaho L. Rev. 431 (2002).
Johnson, Edward J., Comment, The Effect of Historic Parcels on Agriculture-Harvesting Houses, 12 San Joaquin Agric. L. Rev. 49 (2002).
Laurent, Steven J., Michigan's Right to Farm Act: Have Revisions Gone Too Far? 2002 L. Rev. Mich. St. U. Det. C.L. 213 (2002).
London, Johanna J. & Richard J. Langer, Conservation Easements: Important Tools to Preserve Land, 75 Wis. Law. 10 (2002).
Mahoney, Julia D., Perpetual Restrictions on Land and the Problem of the Future, 88 Va. L. Rev. 739 (2002).
McDaniel, Erin, The Uniform Conservation Easements Act: An Attorney's Guide for the Oklahoma Landowner, 55 Okla. L. Rev. 341 (2002).
Nichols, Peter D., Commentary, Do Conservation Easements and Water Mix (in Colorado)? 5 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 504 (2002).
Parenteau, Patrick A., Unreasonable Expectations: Why Palazzolo Has No Right to Turn a Silk Purse into a Sow's Ear, 30 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 101 (2002).
Sax, Joseph L., Using Property Rights to Attack Environmental Protection, 19 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 715 (2002).
Tapick, Jeffrey M., Threats to the Continued Existence of Conservation Easements, 27 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 257 (2002).
Thomas, Lisa N., Forgiving Nuisance and Trespass: Is Oregon's Right-to-Farm Law Constitutional? 16 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 445 (2002).
Thompson, Melissa K. & Jessica E. Jay, An Examination of Court Opinions on the Enforcement and Defense of Conservation Easements and Other Conservation and Preservation Tools: Themes and Approaches to Date, 78 Denv. U. L. Rev. 373 (2001).
Monographs
Lind, Brenda, Land Trust Alliance, Working Forest Conservation Easements: A Process Guide for Land Trusts, Landowners and Public Agencies (2001).
Meiners, Roger E., et al., PERC, Pesticides and Property Rights (2001), available at http://www.perc.org/pdf/ps22.pdf.
Small, Stephen J., Preserving Family Lands: Book III, New Tax Rules and Strategies and a Checklist (2002).
Wilson, C. Thomas, Minnesota Continuing Legal Education, Agricultural Real Estate Update (2002).
Articles
Archer, Ryan M., Searching for the Montana Open Range: A Judicial and Legislative Struggle to Balance Tradition and Modernization in an Evolving West, 63 Mont. L. Rev. 197 (2002).
Campana, Michelle M., Student Article, Public Lands Grazing Fee Reform: Welfare Cowboys and Rolex Ranchers, 10 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 403 (2002).
Epperson, Mark, Public Lands Council v. Babbitt: Another Nail in the Coffin for Ranchers' Claims to Semi-Ownership of Federal Lands?, 22 Pub. Land & Resources L. Rev. 147 (2001).
Monographs
Welfare Ranching: The Subsidized Destruction of the American West (George Wuerthner & Mollie Yoneko Matteson eds., 2002).
Articles
Centner, Terence J., Revising State Recreational Use Statutes to Assist Private Property Owners and Providers of Outdoor Recreational Activities, 9 Buff. Envtl. L.J. 1 (2001).
Cheever, Frederico, Property Rights and the Maintenance of Wildlife Habitat: The Case for Conservation Land Transactions, 38 Idaho L. Rev. 431 (2002).
Ireland, Laura J., Comment, Canning Canned Hunts: Using State and Federal Legislation to Eliminate the Unethical Practice of Canned 'Hunting,' 8 Animal L. 223 (2002).
Speziale, Loren, Walking Through the New Jersey Equine Activity Statute: A Look at Judicial Statutory Interpretation in Jurisdictions with Similar Limited Liability Laws, 12 Seton Hall J. Sport L. 65 (2002).
Articles
Anderson, Katherine S. & Marybeth K. Jones, Comment, Conservation Easements: An Essential Tool in the Practitioner's Estate Planning Toolbox, 35 Land & Water L. Rev. 183 (2000).
Colligan, David J., Forest Land Taxation in the New Millennium: Stewardship Incentivized, 78 Denv. U. L. Rev. 413 (2001).
Commercial Land Qualifies for Agricultural Exemption, 14 J. Prop. Valuation & Tax'n 47 (2002).
Englebrecht, Ted D. & Alisha Kesner-Gray, Special Use Valuation and Its Applicability to Timber, 29 Real Estate Tax'n 4 (2001).
Friedman, Joel & Andrew R. Lee, Estate Tax Repeal Would Be Costly, Yet Benefit Only a Few, 95 Tax Notes 1984 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Charitable Contributions of Commodities by Landowners, 13 Ag-ric. L. Dig. 169 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Distributions from Value-Added Cooperatives, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 57 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Final Regulations on Income for Farmers, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 25 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRA), 13 Agric. L. Dig. 129 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Income Tax Consequences of Abandonment, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 41 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., IRS Thinking on FOBD Liens, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 17 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., The Latest on Mizell, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 137 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., Partition and the Related Party Rule, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 145 (2002.)
Harl, Neil E., When a Contract Obligor Becomes an Owner of the Contract, 13 Agric L. Dig. 161 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., When Are Assets "Used?" 13 Agric. L. Dig. 177 (2002).
Harl, Neil E., When Are Livestock Exchanges "Like-Kind"? 13 Agric. L. Dig. 201 (2002).
Harl, Neil E. & Roger A. McEowen, Gifts of Future Interests, 13 Agric. L. Dig. 105 (2002).
Harl, Neil E. & Roger A. McEowen, On Failure of a Cooperative: When Is a Loss Deductible? 13 Agric. L. Dig. 185 (2002).
Harris, Phillip E., Summary of Selected Provisions of the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 200 [sic], Agric. L. Update, Apr. 2002, at 4.
Hereth, Russell H., Recent Tax Law Change Spurs Investing in Racehorses, 69 Prac. Tax Strategies 206 (2002).
Jensen, Jon J., Limiting Self-Employment Taxation of Actively Farming Landlords, 78 N.D. L. Rev. 441 (2002).
King, Darwin L., Surviving a Timber Tax Audit, 51 Oil, Gas & Energy Q. 157 (2002).
King, Darwin L., The Timber Tax Research Process, 50 Oil, Gas & Energy Q. 821 (2002).
London, Johanna J. & Richard J. Langer, Conservation Easements: Important Tools to Preserve Land, 75 Wis. Law. 10 (2002).
Mohr, Patti, Senate Finance Committee Tries to Codify Economic Substance Doctrine, 96 Tax Notes 1665 (2002).
Price, Charles E. & Leonard G. Weld, Soil Remediation Expenditures Ruled Not Deductible, Taxes, May 2002, at 19.
Raby, Burgess J.W. & William L. Raby, The Farm Property Exception to the Installment Sale Dealer Rules, 95 Tax Notes 219 (2002).
Smith, Greg W. & Horacio Sobol, New Rev. Rul. Says 'Timmm-Berrr' to Built-In Gains Tax for Natural Resource Companies, 96 J. Tax'n 46 (2002).
Sudderth, Tara N. & Tonya Flesher, Patronage Dividends: Bumper Crop or Tax Blight for Small Farmers, Taxes, May 2002, at 35.
Monographs
Small, Stephen J., Preserving Family Lands: Book III, New Tax Rules and Strategies and a Checklist (2002).
Articles
Adler, Robert W., Fresh Water - Toward a Sustainable Future, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10,167 (2002).
Bell, Nina, TMDLs at a Crossroads: Driven by Litigation, Derailed by Controversy? 22 Pub. Land & Resources L. Rev. 61 (2001)
Bloomquist, John, The Agricultural Perspective: TMDLs in the Context of a Clean and Healthful Environment, 22 Pub. Land & Resources L. Rev. 19 (2001).
Compton, Art, The Department of Environmental Quality's Perspective: TMDLs in Montana, 22 Pub. Land & Resources L. Rev. 39 (2001).
Early, W. Blaine, III & Judith A. Villines, Environmental Regulation of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, Bench & Bar, Sept. 2002, at 11
Hale, Mandi M., Pronsolino v. Marcus, The New TMDL Regulation, and Nonpoint Source Pollution: Will the Clean Water Act's Murky TMDL Provision Ever Clear the Waters? 31 Envtl. L. 981 (2001).
Hazlett, Anne, Appellant Court Upholds EPA Authority to Set Limits on Water Pollution from Agricultural Sources, Agric. L. Update, July 2002, at 4.
Houck, Oliver A., The Clean Water Act TMDL Program V: Aftershock and Prelude, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10385 (2002).
Malone, Linda A., The Myths and Truths That Threaten the TMDL Program, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 11133 (2002).
Marks, Josh, Note, Regulating Agricultural Pollution in Georgia: Recent Trends and the Debate Over Integrator Liability, 18 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 1031 (2002).
McCulley, R. Bryant, Note, The Proof Is in the Policy: The Bush Administration, Nonpoint Source Pollution, and EPA's Final TMDL Rule, 59 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 237 (2002).
Noel, Christy, Preemption Hogwash: North Carolina's Judicial Repeal of Local Authority to Regulate Hog Farms, 80 N.C. L. Rev. 2021 (2002).
Sugden, Brian, The Timber Industry Perspective: TMDLs and Forestry, Trying to Make a Square Peg Round, 22 Pub. Land & Resources L. Rev. 47 (2001).
Vergura, Jim & Ron Jones, The TMDL Program: Land Use and Other Implications, 6 Drake J. Agric. L. 317 (2001).
Williams, Douglas R., Sustainable Agriculture: Food for the Future: When Voluntary, Incentive-Based Controls Fail: Structuring a Regulatory Response to Agricultural Nonpoint Source Water Pollution, 9 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 21 (2002).
Articles
Adler, Robert W., Fresh Water - Toward a Sustainable Future, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 10167 (2002).
Dellapenna, Joseph W., The Law of Water Allocation in the Southeastern States at the Opening of the Twenty-First Century, 25 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 9 (2002).
Evans, Brock, Crisis Is the Agent of Real Progress, 19 Envtl. F. 48 (2002).
Getches, David H., The Metamorphosis of Western Water Policy: Have Federal Laws and Local Decisions Eclipsed the States' Role? 20 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 3 (2001).
Gould, George A., A Westerner Looks at Eastern Water Law: Reconsideration of Prior Appropriation in the East, 25 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 89 (2002).
Hayes, David J., Federal-State Decisionmaking on Water: Applying Lessons Learned, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 11253 (2002).
Looney, J.W. & Steven G. Zraick, Of Cows, Canoes, and Commerce: How the Concept of Navigability Provides an Answer if You Know Which Question to Ask, 25 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 175 (2002).
Lyon, Robirda, Comment, The County of Origin Doctrine: Insufficient as a Legal Water Right in California, 12 San Joaquin Agric. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Nichols, Peter D., Commentary, Do Conservation Easements and Water Mix (in Colorado)? 5 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 504 (2002).
Perkins, G. Alan, Arkansas Water Rights: Review and Considerations for Reform, 25 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 123 (2002).
Robinson, Eric N., Claims Court Rules That Giving Farmers' Water to Fish Requires Just Compensation, 19 Cal. Real Prop. J. 29 (2001).
Southwick, Brenda Jahns, Just a Little Bit of R-E-S-P-E-C-T for Farmers, Envtl. F., Mar.-Apr. 2002, at 49.
Spain, Glen, Public Property Rights Must Prevail, Envtl. F., Mar.-Apr. 2002, at 50.
Whitehead, Roy, Jr. & Walter Block, Environmental Takings of Private Water Rights: The Case for Water Privatization, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 11162 (2002).
Woodridge, Sue Ellen, Gov't Helped Cause and Must Help Fix, Envtl. F., Mar.-Apr. 2002, at 53.
Monographs
Looney, J.W., National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, How the Concept of Navigability May Determine the Rights of Landowners Along Streams (2002), at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/research/articles/.
Wolf, Aaron T., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Atlas of International Freshwater Agreements (2002), available at http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/atlas/.
Articles
Adler, Jonathan H., The Ducks Stop Here? The Environmental Challenge to Federalism, 9 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 205 (2001).
Albrecht, Virginia S. & Stephen M. Nickelsburg, Could SWANCC Be Right? A New Look at the Legislative History of the Clean Water Act, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 11042 (2002).
Arnold, Frank S., A Deficit Created by Wetlands Mitigation, Envtl. F., Jan.-Feb. 2002, at 14.
Bennett, Ann, Wetland Regulation and the Wetland Banking Solution for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley: The Effect on Fresno County Development, 12 San Joaquin Agric. L. Rev. 29 (2002).
Calderon, Jeanne A., The SWANCC Decision and the Future of Federal, State, and Local Regulation of Wetlands, 30 Real Est. L.J. 303 (2002).
Cortinovis, Charles A., Note, The Effect of SWANCC on Wetlands Mitigation Banking, 9 Envtl. Law. 253 (2002).
Foster, David S., The Continuing Violations Doctrine and The Clean Water Act: Untenable Solutions and a Need for Reform, 32 Envtl. L. 717 (2002).
Johnston, Margaret A., Note, Environmental Law-Clean Water Act--The Supreme Court Scales Back the Army Corps of Engineers' Jurisdiction Over 'Navigable Waters' Under the Clean Water Act, Solid Waste Agency v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001), 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 329 (2002).
LaMonte, Jennifer, Recent Development, The Supreme Court Limits U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Jurisdiction Over Intrastate Waters that Serve as a Habitat for Migratory Birds, 9 U. Balt. J. Envtl. L. 78 (2001).
Megerian, Talene Nicole, Case Note, Federal Regulation of Isolated Wetlands: To Be or Not To Be? 13 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 157 (2002).
Plyler, Ross B., Note, Protecting South Carolina's Isolated Wetlands in the Wake of Solid Waste Agency, 53 S.C. L. Rev. 757 (2002).
Roche, Elizabeth A, Case Note, The Continuing Saga of Rippling Puddles, Small Handles and Links of Chains, 13 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 119 (2002).
Sicheri, William A., Losing Wetlands Under the Nationwide Permit Program, 8 Envtl. Law. 619 (2002).
Spungin, Debra Alise, Troubled Waters: Florida's Isolated Wetlands in the Aftermath of Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 26 Nova L. Rev. 371 (2001).
Stricherz, Kelly, Case Note, Borden Ranch Partnership v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Getting Ripped--Destroying Wetlands for Wine, 6 Great Plains Nat. Resources J. 170 (2002)
Svensson, Paul Edward, Note and Comment, The Supreme Court's New Federalism: The Authority of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Does Not Extend Over Isolated Intrastate Wetlands Under the Migratory Bird Rule, 19 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 165 (2001).
Taylor, Michelle J., Note, Solid Waste Agency Northern Cook County v. Army Corps of Engineers: The United States Supreme Court Invalidates the Migratory Bird Rule and Raises Questions About the Commerce Clause, 79 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 301 (2002).
Walston, Roderick E., The Federal Commerce and Navigation Powers: Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County's Undecided Constitutional Issue, 42 Santa Clara L. Rev. 699 (2002).
Weinberg, Philip, It's Time for Congress to Rearm the Army Corps of Engineers: A Response to the Solid Waste Agency Decision, 20 Va. Envtl. L.J. 531 (2001).
Monographs
Environmental Law Institute, Banks and Fees: The Status of Off-Site Wetland Mitigation in the United States (2002), available at http://www.elistore.org/reports_detail.asp?ID=10695&topic=Wetlands.
Ruffolo, Jennifer, California State Library, CRB 02-003, The U.S. Supreme Court Limits Federal Regulation of Wetlands: Implications of the SWANCC Decision (2002), available at http://www.library.ca.gov/crb/02/03/02-003.pdf.